Will Networks Take on Rightmove in the UK?

by Simon Baker on 22 September, 2008

in Opinion

Over the last few months we have seen the rise of the “Network” in the UK – in particular the Propertyfinder Network and more recently The Digital Property Group (TDPG) from DMGT. 

A network is a group of sites that, in total, reach a broader UV base than a single site.  In fact, in the materials i was sent by The Digital Property Group, they claimed that “the gap between TDPG and Rightmove stands at just 355k unique users”. 

So what makes up the Propertyfinder Network and The Digital Property Group.  The Propertyfinder Network is made up of the sites owned by Propertyfinder – propertyfinder.com, ukpropertyshop.co.uk and hotproperty.co.uk.  The Digital Property Group is made up of the property sites owned by DMGT – findaproperty.com, primelocation.com, findmeanewhome.com and homesandproperty.co.uk.

As a network, both TDPG and Propertyfinder are much closer to rightmove.co.uk than any of their component sites.

  Total Unique Visitors (000)
RIGHTMOVE.CO.UK 2,400
The Digital Property Group 2,045
Propertyfinder Network 1,501

 

However the real question is, are these “networks” a real threat to rightmove.co.uk or are they just another marketing spin on the numbers to make the gap between rightmove.co.uk and the rest look smaller than it really is?

Firstly, for a network to truly work, the agent must be able to purchase a single subscription and upload a listing that appears on ALL sites within the network.  Now both TDPG and Propertyfinder almost get it right.  The exception to this network rule is findmeanewhome.com for TDPG and ukpropertyshop.co.uk for the Propertyfinder network.  Both of these sites link back to another site (findaproperty.com and propertyfinder.com) rather than keep the user on the site to see properties.

Secondly, while a network may have lots of Unique Visitors (UV’s), it doesnt mean that it is effective.  UV’s measure how many people visited a site or network but they don’t measure how long the visitors spent there or how many pages of information they viewed.

As can be seen from the table below, while rightmove.co.uk had 17% more unique visitors than TDPG, visitors to the site spent 154% more minutes on the site and viewed 245% more pages.

  Total Unique Visitors (000) Total Minutes (MM) Total Pages Viewed (MM) Total Visits (000)
RIGHTMOVE.CO.UK 2,400 93 207 7,903
The Digital Property Group 2,045 36 60 5,188
Difference 17% 154% 245% 52%

 

Therefore, while the gap between The Digital Property Group and rightmove.co.uk might be “just” 355k unique visitors, there is still a vast gap in terms of effectiveness as measured by time on site and therefore more pages viewed.

Advertising Partner

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }

Patrick September 22, 2008 at 3:28 pm

at the end of day, is a network strategy still an effective long term strategy to take on a number 1, assuming effectiveness begins to improve?

Reply

Chris September 23, 2008 at 10:01 am

You mentioned http://www.findmeanewhome.com which should be http://www.findanewhome.com.

Ultimately what matters to the agents is the quality and quantity of leads that are generated for the costs they incur. It doesn’t matter how the sites operate, they will be judged by the agents on the overall response, however this is achieved.

Reply

Sarah K September 23, 2008 at 2:58 pm

Yes – network strategies can be valuable – IF they can demonstrate that they are reaching new users. UVs do not actually count individuals – you cannot legitimately add UVs from one site to another (unless you are able to de-dupe them). Plus I’m not convinced about the value of ‘pages viewed’ and ‘time on site’ as measures of effectiveness. Sure – PIs are useful to the publisher if impression based display ad sales are an important part of the sites’s revenue strategy, but agents not charged on this basis. Rightmove’s relative strong performance in PIs and time on site are likely simply a reflection of its having more inventory (more ‘relevant’ properties = more pages viewed = more time spent on site).

Reply

steve September 30, 2008 at 10:19 am

This may sound crazy, but only the government can unify all the data on properties for sale in a meaningful way; this can be achieved by compulsion.

Simple law: every property for sale in the UK must be registered at .gov.uk. Free to Estate Agents.

Everybody would be happy.

Reply

ChrisB October 6, 2008 at 8:55 am

It is worth noting that you have your information the wrong way round with regards to http://www.findaproperty.com and http://www.findanewhome.com. It is true that all listings form FindaNewHome.com appear on FindaProperty.com but in actual fact, if you come across a new home on FindaProeprty.com you are transferred to FindaNewHome to view its details.

Also, Rightmove has a high level of time on site traffic from agents who log in to their rightmove plus service. These are clearly not househunters in the main so skew the figures with no gain for agents looking for enquiries.

Reply

search-4-property April 6, 2009 at 2:25 pm

I am very happy to hear that other property portals are finally taking on rightmove.

Rightmove has dominated the property portal industry for a lot time and is good news to other property site that their do is finally coming top end.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: